The horse speaks
to the young prince, trying to explain to him the differences between him and
his eldest brother, the king. The passage continues. “You are a scholar by
nature. You see a thing, and you think of the general thing; the group of
things to which it belongs. You see a swallow, and think bird, flying animal,
then animal. You try to understand it and the rules by which it functions.
Others don’t. Others see a thing and act upon it instinctively. In you this is a
weakness and a strength. In others, the same. But you must try to understand
that merely pointing something out to someone such as your brother will not move
him. He will not take it as you intend – he is too firmly committed.”
It seems to
me that if we take the above to heart we might be more charitable when others
act in ways we don’t, can’t or won’t understand. It’s not always easy to hold
back hurtful or critical words or actions, but worth striving for. Being able
to recognize and appreciate differences, it seems to me, is a strength.
Also, it’s
an important attribute of a writer to be able to create characters who are
different from us, different from each other, perhaps lack understanding of
each other, and thus conflicted. Conflict is a necessary element of certain
kinds of writing.
I’m almost
half way through the book, and loving it.
The discovery
in reading and writing can be magical. In the best of a writer’s work, we may
see ourselves and find illumination.
No comments:
Post a Comment